3D bioprinting of Organ-on-Chip

In traditional drug screening approaches, organ-specific effects and the toxicity of a drug are examined using a homogeneous population of specific cells. However, human tissues and organs are not made of a homogeneous cell population. The complexity of human organs is based on intricate interactions between various specialized cell types arranged in precise geometries and interacting with specific microenvironments. These interactions often occur at well-defined tissue interfaces, enabling organ function.

One of the first papers detailing the use of organized cell cultures to study disease was published by Andre Kleber in 1991, reporting the construction of a ventricular myocardium through the patterned growth of cells in vitro, which enabled the first biophysical explanation of conduction block in the heart. The field of biomicrofluidics exploded in the late 1990s with the introduction of poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS), which is an optically transparent, soft elastomer ideal for biological applications on the small scale. The concept of mimicking the organ-level function
of human physiology or disease using cells inside a microfluidic chip was first published in 2004, when
Michael Shuler and colleagues first demonstrated a system that captured the systemic interaction between lung and liver on a one square inch silicon chip. A range of microfluidic devices have since been developed, mimicking diverse biological functions by culturing cells from blood vessels, muscles, bones, airways, liver, brain, gut and kidney. In 2010, the term organ-on-a-chip was invented by Donald Ingber, who developed a microfluidic chip to capture organ-level functions of the human lung.

This project was started to overcome the limitations of the existing PDMS-based Organ-on-Chip systems. Some of the limitations of the present systems are:

  1. PDMS has higher stiffness (~100 kPA) compared to extracellular matrix or ECM (1-2 kPa).
  2. Higher stiffness of PDMS leads to non-physiological growth of cells. Furthermore, hydrophobicity of PDMS also leads to poor adhesion of primary mammalian cells.
  3. Cells cannot remodel their environment as an adaptive response, like they could in the body.
  4. PDMS membranes are often made as a regular array of micropores in Organ-on-Chip systems, which may exaggerate the behaviour of innate ECM.

These limitations could be overcome by making Organ-on-Chip devices using hydrogels such as collagen, alginate and gelatin. They are usually as transparent as PDMS and have stiffness of 5-15 kPA which is more physiological. In this project, a detailed investigation of challenges involved in 3D printing of hydrogels was done.

The device was made entirely out of hydrogel, channel geomery was created to mimic the exisiting Organ-on-Chip models and the resulting device (Fig 1) was completely transparent.

Figure 1: Comaprison between 3D rendering (left) and actual 3D-bioprinted device
  • Further information is restricted
  • ©Laboratory of Microbiology and Microsystems, EPFL Switzerland

References:

  1. Zhang, B., Korolj, A., Lai, B.F.L. et al. Advances in organ-on-a-chip engineering. Nat Rev Mater 3, 257–278 (2018).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s